It is contended by Mr. Reilly that the vessels be commanded by a naval officer under clause 57 of Sect. 3, his Commission tout legalize the proceedings of the people anywhere - but if to no Act was he referring. For that purpose - Altogether it often seems to me and I venture to advance the opinion with much hesitation - that a use is now made of the Imperial Act which was not contemplated by its framers - and that although its provisions are sufficiently wide to ever cover the ground - they cannot be so construed or extended beyond that ground else. More is not in the margin and something else is sufficiently wide for such purpose.
4
It is contended by Mr. Reilly 394
that? the bessels be Coremanded bey a naval officer-
under clause 57
of Sexta 3. his Commission tout legalize the promanings of tubepl anywhere - but if to no Act
was heupary. For that purpose -
Altogether it aftens tome
and J
Ј
of
courte advance the
Spinion with remuch Resitation -
Phat a use is noo
Fought toke
made of the Serperial Act which was not contemplated by tom framers - and that although
its provious
вагда
are
to ever
the grundkecant
suffrently
Jeulled
tobe Covered - Mery Caunch the foulle]
or extended beover that ground
elve. More is no
and something else.
margin Aft sufferently woode
for such purpose
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.